MOVIE REVIEW: World War Z

You have to really love zombies to like this film

 

(SPOT.ph) If you have the attention span of a zombie, we'll give the verdict to you straight: this movie is largely disappointing and wastes the talent of Mireille Enos, who you can catch in the new series The Killing.

We don't mean that it's unfaithful to the book (you naughty, naughty movie) because we're not prudes that way. We say this as fans of the zombie genre. We the patient few who sit through movies that follow the same trajectory: Calm-Chaos-Exposition-Chaos-Conclusion.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW
CONTINUE READING BELOW
Recommended Videos

It's pretty hard to get that wrong and Marc Forster and his team deserve an award for making that perfect formula more tedious than Night of the Living Dead, made in 1968. George A. Romero's classic is at least only tedious now, since we've been introduced to running zombies (thanks Danny Boyle!).

The film tries and it tries hard. Maybe a little too hard. It wants to be serious and it ends up feeling a little uptight and pretentious. There's only one real character in the film (Mr. Angelina Jolie) and he isn't even interesting enough to care about. Everyone else might as well be zombies. Even his family is a paper thin plot device. We need a pharmacy scene! Let's make his child asthmatic!

 

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Savor the unblurry moments, there are so few

 

If they are familiar with the book, the thing that will get most people fuming is that World War Z by Max Brooks is a pretty solid social commentary. We don't even know what the movie was trying to say or if it was trying to say anything substantial at all. There was a scene in Korea and in Israel, some mention of India being a black hole but it all feels hastily baked and sloppily presented. There was a teeny, tiny bit of tension towards the end but Dead Set, a British TV program, grabs your attention with a 24-minute episode. World War Z runs for 116 minutes and excites (but barely) only in the last few.

The film begs and pleads for you to care about Gerry (Brad Pitt) but how? And more importantly: why? Governments are collapsing, people are dying but what do we see? These aerial shots of people running and chaos, chaos, chaos. That's all fine as establishing shots but must there be so many? It seems that the movie is trying to compensate for the lack of cohesion with (literal) piles of zombie.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

 

Oh look. A pile of zombies.

 

It makes you feel cheated because the camera pans and whips across the action, trying to simulate the disorientation that the people feel instead of actually showing something. The story unfolds in uncomfortably claustrophobic, shaky, and dark shots.

If you have never touched the novel, it will make you feel like the 342 pages of the book is about 300 pages of introduction and 42 pages of hasty conclusion.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

 

RATING: •• 2 out of 5 spots

Are you sure you want to delete this list?
Cancel
Delete
ADD YOUR OWN FAVE
Share your favorite if we missed it! Type your pick here and tell us why you love it.
You can add any number of items, whether it's just one or a list of 10. This is a required field.
Sample Error message
Add a short description
Sample Error message
0/150
+ Add to list
Delete
Submit
Looks like you're not Logged In or Registered yet
Get Started
to save your list.
Thank you for submitting your own list
Check out another top 10 article we hope you'd like:

Top 10 Lists

Most Liked
Most Recent
Share
Tweet
Posted by:

Tell us your #feels!

0
Total votes
View more stories tagged

Read more stories about

Latest Stories

Load More Stories